THE PRESIDENT’S COLUMN

ARTICLES

RECENT EVENTS

Tours Pvt Ltd v Hilton International Manage (Maldives) Pvt Ltd, [2019] SGCA 10

By Tham Wei Chern, Daniel Lee – Fullerton Law Chambers LLC

A. Facts
1. Hilton obtained a Singapore-seated ICC award against Sun arising out of Sun’s repudiation of a hotel management agreement. Sun had counterclaimed for fraudulent misrepresentation and breach of duty of care and skill.
2. Hilton attempted to enforce the award in the Maldives (the “Maldives Enforcement”).
3. Sun simultaneously commenced court proceedings in the Maldives, essentially re-litigating the issues that had been decided in the arbitration (the “Maldives Suit”).
4. Instead of immediately applying (in the Singapore Courts) for an order for Sun to cease the Maldives Suit, Hilton instead challenged the Maldives Suit on jurisdictional grounds and failed before the Maldives Courts.

 

BAZ V BBA, [2018] SGHC 275

By Tham Wei Chern, Daniel Lee – Fullerton Law Chambers LLC

A. Facts
1. The Plaintiff sought to enforce, in Singapore, a Singapore seated ICC award. The Defendants resisted the enforcement.
2. The arbitration arose out of a transaction in which the Plaintiff bought shares in a company owned by the Defendants. The Plaintiff commenced arbitration proceedings against the Defendants for fraudulent misrepresentation, on the grounds that the Defendants had concealed information on scandals and regulatory breaches, which had reduced the true value of the shares. The Plaintiff was successful in the arbitration and obtained an award in its favour.

IN HOT SEAT

In each issue of our newsletter, we interview an SIArb member to get their views on the alternative dispute resolution scene in Singapore, and to obtain some insight into what makes them tick. In this issue, we interview Prof. Leslie Chew SC.

Read More 

Developments in Singapore Arbitration (12 February 2019)

Singapore’s prominence in the international arbitration scene continues to rise in 2018. While Singapore arbitration landscape remained relatively stable in 2018 – with no new rules or procedures being introduced – the number of reported court decisions arising from or relating to arbitration have increased, reflecting the buzz in this space.
In the past year, the Singapore Courts have had the occasion to revisit established principles and navigate new territory in the law relating to and governing arbitrations. These include 4 applications to set aside arbitral awards; 2 applications to review the arbitral tribunal’s jurisdiction; and the usual stream of stay applications.

Party-Representative Ethics: Time To Move The Needle? (24 January 2019)

The 10th anniversary of the SIArb symposium did not fail to live up to expectations. With a diverse number of thought-provoking questions submitted by the audience beforehand, each session navigated several areas of controversy, and also gave rise to some very helpful contributions from audience members based on their own experience (submitted within the confines of the “Chatham House” rules!). Last but not least, the all-female cohort of moderators for the sessions served as a radical and refreshing departure from the usual line-up of conference chairs.

upcoming events

Date
Event

28 March 2019                                                 
11 April 2019
26, 27 & 29 April 2019
30 April 2019
07 May 2019
The Discretion to Enforce
13 June 2019
30 September 2019
SIArb Annual General Meeting
10, 11, 18, 19 & 21 October 2019
Fellowship Assessment Course 2019 (FAC)
26 November 2019
SIArb Commercial Arbitration Symposium 2019
27 November 2019
SIArb Annual Dinner 2019
05 December 2019
SIArb Annual Debate 2019

View our Past & Upcoming Events HERE

ARTICLES

Tours Pvt Ltd v Hilton International Manage (Maldives) Pvt Ltd, [2019] SGCA 10

By Tham Wei Chern, Daniel Lee – Fullerton Law Chambers LLC

A. Facts
1. Hilton obtained a Singapore-seated ICC award against Sun arising out of Sun’s repudiation of a hotel management agreement. Sun had counterclaimed for fraudulent misrepresentation and breach of duty of care and skill.
2. Hilton attempted to enforce the award in the Maldives (the “Maldives Enforcement”).
3. Sun simultaneously commenced court proceedings in the Maldives, essentially re-litigating the issues that had been decided in the arbitration (the “Maldives Suit”).
4. Instead of immediately applying (in the Singapore Courts) for an order for Sun to cease the Maldives Suit, Hilton instead challenged the Maldives Suit on jurisdictional grounds and failed before the Maldives Courts.

 

BAZ V BBA, [2018] SGHC 275

By Tham Wei Chern, Daniel Lee – Fullerton Law Chambers LLC

A. Facts
1. The Plaintiff sought to enforce, in Singapore, a Singapore seated ICC award. The Defendants resisted the enforcement.
2. The arbitration arose out of a transaction in which the Plaintiff bought shares in a company owned by the Defendants. The Plaintiff commenced arbitration proceedings against the Defendants for fraudulent misrepresentation, on the grounds that the Defendants had concealed information on scandals and regulatory breaches, which had reduced the true value of the shares. The Plaintiff was successful in the arbitration and obtained an award in its favour.

IN HOT SEAT

In each issue of our newsletter, we interview an SIArb member to get their views on the alternative dispute resolution scene in Singapore, and to obtain some insight into what makes them tick. In this issue, we interview Prof. Leslie Chew SC.

Read More 

RECENT EVENTS

Developments in Singapore Arbitration (12 February 2019)

Singapore’s prominence in the international arbitration scene continues to rise in 2018. While Singapore arbitration landscape remained relatively stable in 2018 – with no new rules or procedures being introduced – the number of reported court decisions arising from or relating to arbitration have increased, reflecting the buzz in this space.
In the past year, the Singapore Courts have had the occasion to revisit established principles and navigate new territory in the law relating to and governing arbitrations. These include 4 applications to set aside arbitral awards; 2 applications to review the arbitral tribunal’s jurisdiction; and the usual stream of stay applications.

Party-Representative Ethics: Time To Move The Needle? (24 January 2019)

The 10th anniversary of the SIArb symposium did not fail to live up to expectations. With a diverse number of thought-provoking questions submitted by the audience beforehand, each session navigated several areas of controversy, and also gave rise to some very helpful contributions from audience members based on their own experience (submitted within the confines of the “Chatham House” rules!). Last but not least, the all-female cohort of moderators for the sessions served as a radical and refreshing departure from the usual line-up of conference chairs.

upcoming events

Date
Event

28 March 2019                                                 
11 April 2019
26, 27 & 29 April 2019
30 April 2019
07 May 2019
The Discretion to Enforce
13 June 2019
30 September 2019
SIArb Annual General Meeting
10, 11, 18, 19 & 21 October 2019
Fellowship Assessment Course 2019 (FAC)
26 November 2019
SIArb Commercial Arbitration Symposium 2019
27 November 2019
SIArb Annual Dinner 2019
05 December 2019
SIArb Annual Debate 2019

View our Past & Upcoming Events HERE

ANNOUNCEMENTS

New Members

The Institute extends a warm welcome to the following members: 

Associates

Ramesh Bharani Nagaratnam

 

Members

Christopher Rudland

Mohammed Forrukh Rahman

Fellows

Stephen Strick

Siraj Omar

Catherine Lim

Chan Kah Chong

Peng Kong Luke

Doan Thuan Hai

R.V.S. Mani

Associates

Ramesh Bharani Nagaratnam

 

Members

Christopher Rudland

Mohammed Forrukh Rahman

Fellows

Stephen Strick

Siraj Omar

Catherine Lim

Chan Kah Chong

Peng Kong Luke

Doan Thuan Hai

R.V.S. Mani

Panel Arbitrators

The Institute congratulates the following on their admission to the panel of arbitrators: 

Primary

Secondary

Primary

Secondary

Call for Contribution of Articles

The SIArb Newsletter is a publication of the Singapore Institute of Arbitrators aimed to be an educational resource for members and associated organisations and institutions of higher learning. Readers of the newsletter are welcome to submit to the Secretariat at secretariat@siarb.org.sg well-researched manuscripts of merit relating to the subject matter of arbitration and dispute resolution. Submissions should be unpublished works between 1,500 to 2,500 words and are subject to the review of the editorial team.

Council (2018 - 2019)

President    
Dinesh Dhillon
Vice President
Tay Yu-Jin
Honorary Secretary
Francis Goh
Honorary Treasurer
Mohan R Pillay
Immediate Past President
Chan Leng Sun S.C.
Council Members

Chia Chor Leong
(co-opted wef 5 Oct 2017)

Chia Ho Choon
Andrew Pullen
Ramesh Selvaraj
Rebecca Tai Andersen
Yeo Boon Tat

Publications Committee

Chair
Yeo Boon Tat
Committee Members
Chew Yee Teck, Eric
Dr. Chung Kah Keat, David
Justin Gan
Gan Kam Yuin
Fayth Kuah
Lim Hseng Iu
Dr. Adolf Peter
Ananya Pratap Singh
Christopher Tan Teow Hin
Tan Beng Hui, Carolyn
Tham Wei Chern
Dr. Gunawan Widjaja

Disclaimer
The SIArb Newsletter is a quarterly of the publication of the Singapore Institute of Arbitrators. Distribution is restricted to members and those organisations and institutions of higher learning associated with the Institute.

The Institute does not hold itself responsible for the views expressed in the Newsletter which must necessarily lie with the contributors

Scroll to Top