Home

ANNOUNCEMENT(S)

15 February 2024

Thank you June and Intellitrain, welcome CMA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Happy Lunar New Year to all of our fellows, members, colleagues and friends of the SIArb who celebrate. 

May the Year of the Dragon bring you joy, success, good health and abundance! 

The Lunar New Year is customarily a time for reunions with loved ones, to give thanks and to celebrate new beginnings.  In this connection, this season marks a time of thanksgiving and transition for SIArb as we onboard a new secretariat team following the retirement of Intellitrain as SIArb's secretariat services provider. 

As a volunteer led organisation with an extremely busy annual programme, SIArb has been fortunate to have had the support of June Tan and her fantastic team at Intellitrain over the past decade.  Intellitrain has contributed as a true stakeholder of SIArb, seeing through milestone after milestone, including our 40th anniversary Gala Dinner in 2022, digitalising and taking our Fellowship and International Entry Courses to the next level during the unprecedented pandemic years, launching the Singapore Arbitration Journal and not least organising innumerable successful lectures, symposia, seminars and social events that our members and friends have enjoyed year after year.  Despite a challenging handover years ago, Intellitrain leaves SIArb on strong foundations with three consecutive years of growth and a solid financial position.

In these respects, June and her team over the years (including Joy, Lynn, Cheryl, Linh, Daphne, Shandy, Keerthi, Gabriel and others who have worked behind the scenes) will always be fondly remembered as part of the SIArb family.

June Tan collage

On behalf of SIArb, Council wishes to convey our utmost gratitude to June and her team (present and past) for their contributions to SIArb’s development and evolution.  Many of our members will have interacted with June at some point and we will all miss her. 

Sadly, the time has come to bid farewell to Intellitrain as secretariat, but we will continue to count them as friends and look forward to welcoming June and her team as special guests of SIArb on future occasions. 

Effective 15 February 2024, directors Allison Law and Beatrice Goh and their team at CMA International Consultants will be taking over in providing secretariat services for SIArb.  CMA was founded in 1995 and has over 25 years of experience in providing secretariat services to professionals-led associations as well as conference and event management.  Their contact details will be published on SIArb's website and LinkedIn page.  The new SIArb enquiries hotline will be +65 6336 4970.

2024 got off to a cracking start with two CPD events already, including the ever popular annual 'Developments in Singapore Arbitration' hybrid seminar by Professor Lawrence Boo and Delphine Ho, which again attracted over 100 registrations in Singapore and abroad. 

Given the transition in the secretariat team, Council foresees that we are likely to have to moderate the number of events organised by SIArb in the initial few months.  Thank you in advance for your understanding and patience as we welcome CMA to the SIArb family.  Our priority is to ensure a smooth transition so that our governance and cornerstone activities, in particular our membership and fellowship courses, will not be impacted.  We plan to pick up the pace of events again later in the year and will continue to hold our flagship events such as the SIArb Lecture, Annual Symposium and Annual Dinner.

If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to reach out to me or any of the Council Members.  

Thank you and I look forward to seeing everyone at our upcoming events.

Tay Yu-Jin

President, SIArb 2023-2025
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

5 August 2022

Kelvin Aw

Questions:

How would you describe yourself in three words?

Pioneer. Professional. Passionate.

How did you first get involved in arbitration work?

In 1999, I relocated from London to Singapore. At the time I was a foreign lawyer, being called to the Singapore Bar in 2013, such that I could only act as counsel in arbitration references. At the same time, Singapore was developing as an international arbitration centre and growing in popularity in the sectors in which I was developing my practice as a young lawyer; insurance, energy and construction. The diversity of the clients, the less formal nature of arbitration, the opportunity to travel and the strong support for the growth of arbitration in Singapore incentivised the decision to develop a sector focused international arbitration practice. I have never looked back.

In the course of your work, do you notice a trend in clients preferring arbitration over litigation as a form of dispute resolution?

In sectors such as construction, clients have always preferred arbitration over litigation and that trend is continuing. In other sectors, such as insurance, that trend is growing as the insurance market demands confidential awards that carry no precedent value. But in other sectors, such as energy, clients are starting to prefer litigation over arbitration for two reasons. First, procedural rules are being modernised and industry specialist judges are being appointed to commercial courts. Second, the cost of the arbitral tribunal is becoming too expensive and the arbitral tribunals are publishing awards that are more frequently set aside. These trends have to be reversed if confidence in arbitration as an effective dispute resolution process is to be maintained. For example, a one (not three) person tribunal should be mandatory.    

What is the most memorable arbitration or arbitration related matter that you were involved in, and why?

To provide a balanced answer, perhaps I can offer two such matters. I was instructed in both matters by an international construction company in connection with two iconic building projects developed ten years apart. The first matter was against the design engineer. We succeeded and recovered a nine-figure dollar sum from the engineer’s insurers. More importantly, the contractor was approved for future projects which led to the creation of thousands of jobs over the subsequent 15 years. The second matter was against construction all risks insurers. We did not succeed notwithstanding that the claim was clearly covered. This decision led to the destruction of trust in all risks cover and in the arbitration process, exemplified by the fact that the tribunal was incapable of drafting the Final Award without an agreed draft from counsel. The lesson learned is that the selection of the tribunal is the most important step in an arbitration.    

What advice do you have for a young fellow practitioner interested in arbitration work?

I would first parrot my then Pupil Master’s advice to me, and that is to decide on early specialisation and get into the arbitration circuit as soon as you are qualified to do so. Secondly, I would encourage young practitioners to consider the myriad dimensions in which arbitration cross-fertilises with other forms of ADR, because there is no “one size fits all” solution to dispute resolution.

What are the challenges you think arbitration practitioners will face in the upcoming years?

Clients want honest advice, whether to resolve the dispute through arbitration or settle the dispute on best commercial terms. To get that advice, clients want counsel who know their industries (to understand the dispute), know the arbitration rules (to resolve the dispute) and know the good and the bad arbitrators (to succeed in the dispute). So, look to establish yourself in a particular industry and in the arbitration profession.

What are the challenges you think arbitration practitioners will face in the upcoming years?

Competition, although the better term is probably saturation. As arbitration has become more popular, so it has attracted and become saturated with counsel and arbitrators who are general practitioners or retired industry professionals rather than specialist arbitration counsel or arbitrators. As a result, it has become increasingly difficult for clients to identify specialist counsel and experienced arbitrators from those (and there are many) who purport to have specialist expertise, in the industry or the procedure, when they do not. The result is that cases are poorly pleaded, weakly prosecuted and wrongly determined, leading to spiralling costs, an increase in the number of applications to set aside and a general wariness of the arbitration process. The answer is to limit the entrants to the legal profession by imposing a 25% bar exam pass rate. But this will never happen because it is politically and socially unattractive.

With the establishment of the Singapore International Mediation Centre and the introduction of the SIAC-SIMCArb-Med-Arb Protocol, do you see mediation as now having a bigger role to play in assisting parties to resolve their disputes?

Yes and No. Yes, in the sense that both the Centre and the Protocol raise the awareness of mediation as a means of resolving disputes. No, in the sense that it is the conduct of the mediation that determines whether the dispute is resolved or not. In my experience, the facilitative method of mediation (being the mediator couriering of offers backwards and forwards) is far less successful than the evaluative method (being the mediator assessing whether one party will win or lose). Put more bluntly, the best type of mediator is the worst type of bully. One that is not afraid to tell a party what they do not want to hear. The same could be said of counsel and arbitrators.

Who is the person(s) who has had the greatest impact and/or influence on your career?

Jose Maria Olazabal. I thought I wanted to be a touring golf professional until, as a decent amateur, I witnessed a 14-year-old who was to become one of the best touring professionals of his generation, and nicest guys you could meet. And it is a lesson that transfers to arbitration practice. It is only when you have conducted as counsel, not as instructing solicitor, a claim from the initial meeting with the client to the publication of the Final Award that you appreciate the rigours of the process, the detail required to prevail and the stubbornness (or charm) that you need to tell a client when to settle. 

If you weren’t in your current profession, what profession would you be in?

That part of the golf profession reserved for the least talented and most delusional.

What’s your guilty pleasure?

A recurring fantasy. Walking down the eighteenth fairway at St. Andrew’s in the final round of The Open with a three strokes lead on a beautiful summer’s evening in July having started the day six shots back of Tiger Woods, Rory McIlroy and John Rahm.

What is one talent that not many people know you have?

A combination of too much golf and too little marketing have meant that my ability to miss a putt from almost any distance is acknowledged far more widely than my ability to identify and resolve the two or three issues on which any insurance, energy or construction dispute inevitably turn, however large or seemingly complex.  

Fill in the blank: “Arbitration is to dispute resolution as salt is to an open wound”.

 
 
 

Latest Events

Events Calendar

May 2024
S M T W T F S
28 29 30 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31 1

Site designed and maintained by Intellitrain Pte Ltd.  Copyright © Singapore Institute of Arbitrators.  All rights reserved.

Website Terms of Use     Privacy Policy

Go to top